New Users Registration  |  Useful Links  |  FAQ  |  Site Map 
 
Go Search

 

Skip Navigation LinksHealth Xchange > News
  News  
  Categories  
     
  Chronology  
 
  2013 2014   Dec 2014 | Nov 2014 | Oct 2014 | Sep 2014 | Aug 2014 | Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | May 2014 | Apr 2014 | Mar 2014 | Feb 2014 | Jan 2014 |
  2013   Dec 2013 | Nov 2013 | Oct 2013 | Sep 2013 | Aug 2013 | Jul 2013 | Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | Feb 2013 | Jan 2013 |
  2012   Dec 2012 | Nov 2012 | Oct 2012 | Sep 2012 | Aug 2012 | Jul 2012Jun 2012May 2012Apr 2012Mar 2012 | Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 |
  2011   Dec 2011Nov 2011Oct 2011 | Sep 2011 | Aug 2011Jul 2011Jun 2011 | May 2011 | Apr 2011 | Mar 2011 | Feb 2011 | Jan 2011 |
  2010   Dec 2010 | Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | Sep 2010 | Aug 2010 | Jul 2010 | Jun 2010 | May 2010 | Apr 2010 | Mar 2010 | Feb 2010 | Jan 2010 |
  2009   Dec 2009 | Nov 2009 | Oct 2009 | Sep 2009 | Aug 2009 |
 
     
  Topic  
 
  Health Policy and Announcements | Diseases and Outbreaks
  Medical Research | New Treatments and Technology
   
 
     
  RSS  
 
  Singapore   SingHealth | Health Promotion Board | Ministry of Health | Asiaone
  International   World Health Organization | Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
       
 
     
  News Article  
 

The Subutex Effect

 
  Saturday, 24 l 09 l 2011  Source: The Straits Times   
By: Tham Yuen C
     
 

Drug for helping heroin addicts kick habit a cause of erratic arrest figures

subutexCALL it the Subutex effect. One of the reasons drug enforcers took three years to realise that their annual arrest figures since 2008 were wrong can be traced to Subutex, a drug initially introduced to help heroin addicts kick their habit. In fact, the Subutex effect accounts for many of the peaks and troughs in Singapore’s drug arrests over the last decade.

In 2002, Subutex was introduced here as a form of treatment to wean heroin abusers off their addiction. Commonly sold as a pill that dissolves under the tongue, its main purpose was to relieve the withdrawal symptoms from quitting heroin. The number of people arrested for drug abuse fell steadily over the next five years, from 3,393 in 2002 to 793 in 2005. But it was not because Subutex had cured heroin addicts. Instead, they had discovered another use for Subutex. By mixing it with other drugs, then injecting it into their body, they used it to achieve the same high they got from heroin. Since Subutex was then legal, its abuse soon became rampant – but abusers were not arrested and so did not make it to the log of arrests by the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB).

drug-abusers-arrested

In August 2006, Subutex was reclassified as a controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act, making it illegal. In the next two years, drug arrest figures started creeping up again. Drug enforcers attributed this to the arrest of people who abused the now-illegal Subutex. At its peak in 2006 and 2007, Subutex was the most abused drug here, with more than 30 per cent of abusers taking it. Meanwhile, in 2008, CNB moved to a new computer system to track drug arrests, programming it to capture all cases. Unknown to enforcers then, large numbers of yearly arrests that were still pending were not reflected in the annual statistics. From 2008 to earlier this year when the mistake was uncovered, statistics wrongly showed that there was a steady drop in drug arrests, when in fact there was an increase. The declining numbers did not raise eyebrows at CNB – because of Subutex. Officers reckoned that the clampdown on Subutex abusers from August 2006 had resulted in many hardcore addicts being jailed. It thus seemed reasonable that arrests would start to fall. “The drop from 2007 to 2008 of about 300 drug abusers arrested did not seem like an anomaly, because a lot of abusers were already in jail,” said Mr Marvin Sim, deputy director of CNB, at a press conference on Thursday.

Now, faced with the correct statistics showing an increase in drug arrests from 2008 to last year, enforcers also have a Subutex-linked theory. Mr Herman Lee, senior research and planning executive at CNB, said that after serving their jail terms, Subutex abusers were turning back to heroin. This was because the Subutex ban had led to a spike in its price, making it more expensive than heroin in 2008. The increased cultivation of opium poppy in the region – heroin is derived from opium – has also made heroin more widely available. Mr Freddy Wee, deputy director of Breakthrough Missions, a halfway house for addicts, said that after Subutex became a controlled drug, its price started to rise, leading addicts back to heroin. In fact, heroin overtook Subutex in 2008 as the most abused drug, and has remained the top drug menace since, with methamphetamine a distant second. These two drugs also topped the list of drugs used by abusers arrested in the first half of this year. About 90 per cent of them took at least heroin or methamphetamine, also known as Ice. In all, CNB seized $7.7 million worth of drugs in the first half of this year, an increase from the $5.9 million worth seized in the same period last year.

All in, 1,745 abusers were arrested in the first six months this year, a rise of 20 per cent or 285 people over the same period last year. About 1,100 of them were repeat offenders. Nearly one-third of this group were Malays, followed by Chinese and Indians, and addicts who were 40 years old and above formed the largest group among them. At Thursday’s press conference, CNB director Ng Boon Gay said the drug situation is expected to get worse in the years ahead. This is because over the next four years, the agency expects some 3,600 repeat drug abusers to be released after completing their long-term jail sentences.

Given the 30 per cent recidivism rate among repeat drug abusers, CNB will be focusing its efforts on keeping them off their habit. “We will tighten supervision of these repeat abusers to make sure they don’t go back to drugs, and if they do we can catch them early,” said Mr Ng. CNB is considering measures like increasing the frequency that these repeat abusers will need to report back to the bureau for checks, and also more surprise urine tests. By intensifying measures against repeat offenders, CNB is also hoping they will not introduce more people to drugs. Mr Ng said younger people have become more lax towards drugs. A survey the bureau did in 2009 showed 13 per cent of young people would accept drugs from a friend in order not to lose that friend. “These attitudes are worrying,” he said.

     
  Ask the Specialists - Free Doctor Q&A
(Now - 15th Nov)
 
    Women's Pain
If you have question on pain management as it relates to a woman’s health, take this opportunity to ask our expert.
 
    Answered Q&As
Check out our archive for all our previous doctor's Q&As!
*Latest Update: Stress and Anxiety
 
e-Appointment Online
Health Buddy App